腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗成人腹壁疝临床疗效及对白细胞介素-6和C反应蛋白水平影响的研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

江涛,E-mail:lyg_7920@163.com

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Comparison of curative efficacy and impact of IL-6 and CRP between laparoscopic and open surgery in treatment adults abdominal wall hernia
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗成人腹壁疝临床疗效及预后情况。方法 选取2011年1月-2014年4月于该院接受手术治疗的129例成人腹壁疝患者作为研究对象,回顾性分析其临床资料,按照手术方式分为对照组62例和观察组67例。对照组患者行开腹疝修补术,观察组患者行腹腔镜疝修补术。比较对照组和观察组患者手术情况、术后并发症、炎性因子水平及复发率。结果 所有患者均手术成功,与对照组相比,观察组患者术中出血量减少[(21.60±5.80)vs(61.60±10.30)ml]、术后疼痛时间、下床活动时间及住院时间缩短[(30.60±6.30)vs(45.20±7.40)h,(14.70±2.50)vs(20.80±4.60)h,(5.30±0.90)vs(8.70±1.30)d],组间比较差异均有统计学意义(均P <0.05),而手术时间两组间比较差异无统计学意义[(75.50±11.60)vs(79.70±16.40)min,P >0.05)]。术后观察组患者并发症总发生率低于对照组(14.9% vs 33.9%,P <0.05)。术后24和48 h,观察组患者血清白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、C反应蛋白(CRP)等炎性因子水平较对照组降低,组间比较差异均有统计学意义(均P <0.05)。随访2年,两组患者腹壁疝复发率差异无统计学意义(1.5% vs 6.5%,P >0.05)。结论 腹腔镜和开腹疝修补术均是成人腹壁疝的有效手术方式,但腹腔镜疝修补术创伤小,在降低术后并发症发生率、减轻手术带来的炎症损伤方面具有更明显的优势,临床上值得应用。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the curative efficacy and prognosis between laparoscopic and open surgery in treatment of adults abdominal wall hernia. Methods 129 patients of adult abdominal wall hernia from January 2011 to April 2014 were selected as research objects. Retrospectively analyzed their clinical data and then divided them into control group (n = 62) and observation group (n = 67) according to operation method. The control group was given open surgery of herniorrhaphy, while the observation group was given laparoscopic surgery of herniorrhaphy. Then, operation features, postoperative complications incidence, inflammatory factors levels and recurrence rate were record and compared. Results All patients underwent successful operation with herniorrhaphy. In comparison with the control group, the observation group had statistically less bleeding volume during surgery [(21.60 ± 5.80) vs (61.60 ± 10.30) ml], shorter pain time, evacuation active time and hospitalization time [(30.60 ± 6.30) vs (45.20 ± 7.40) h, (14.70 ± 2.50) vs (20.80 ± 4.60) h, (5.30 ± 0.90) vs (8.70 ± 1.30) d, all P < 0.05], while the operation time between the two groups were statistically same (P > 0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation was statistically lower than that in control group (14.9 % vs 33.9 %, P < 0.05). As to inflammatory factors, 24 hours and 48 hours after the surgery, levels of IL-6 and CRP in the observation group was respectively statistically lower in comparison with control group (all P < 0.05). After the two-year follow-up, the recurrence rate in the observation group was statistically the same with that in control group (1.5 % vs 6.5 %, P > 0.05). Conclusion Open and laparoscopic surgery of herniorrhaphy are both effective operation methods for adult patients with abdominal wall hernia. However, laparoscopic surgery of herniorrhaphy has less surgical trauma, and it showed more advantages in reducing incidence of postoperative complications, alleviating inflammatory damage caused by operation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李永刚,蔡天勇,江涛.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗成人腹壁疝临床疗效及对白细胞介素-6和C反应蛋白水平影响的研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,22(8):79-82

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-27
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-08-30
二维码
中国内镜杂志声明
关闭