明视插管软镜和Macintosh直接喉镜在颈椎制动患者气管插管中的比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

叶茜琳,E-mail:442460371@qq.com

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Comparison of tracheal intubations using video intubationscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilization
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 比较明视插管软镜与Macintosh直接喉镜在颈椎制动患者经口气管插管中的临床效果及对血流动力学的影响。方法 择期气管插管全麻手术患者60例,美国麻醉师协会评级(ASA)Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄19~68岁,随机分为明视插管软镜组(V组)和Macintosh直接喉镜组(M组),每组30例。常规静脉麻醉诱导后,手法制动头颈部,V组采用明视插管软镜,M组采用Macintosh直接喉镜行经口气管插管。观察记录两组声门暴露时间、镜下Cormark-Lehane(C-L分级)、导管置入时间、试插次数、失败例数、气管插管一次成功率及气管插管总成功率,记录麻醉诱导前(T0)、插管前(T1)、声门暴露时(T2)、插管后即刻(T3)、插管后1 min(T4)和插管后3 min(T5)时的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)及气管插管不良反应。结果 与M组比较,V组声门暴露情况(C-L分级)更好(P <0.05),但声门暴露时间明显延长(P <0.05),导管置入时间则明显缩短(P <0.05)。M组需要助手辅助插管的比例、插管失败率及并发症发生率均明显高于V组(均P <0.05)。与T1比较,T2~T5时M组MAP均明显升高(均P <0.05),T2时V组MAP无明显改变(P >0.05),T3~T5时V组MAP明显升高(P <0.05);与M组比较,V组MAP在T2~T4时均明显低于M组(P <0.05)。与T1比较,T2~T5时V组HR无明显改变,T2~T4时M组HR明显上升(均P <0.05),且明显高于V组同时间点的HR水平(均P <0.05)。结论 与Macintosh直接喉镜比较,明视插管软镜在颈椎制动患者经口气管插管中可显著改善声门暴露,降低插管难度,提高插管成功率,并发症少,且对患者的血流动力学影响较小。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the video intubationscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope in simulated cervical spine immobilization. Methods Sixty patients, ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ, between 19 and 68 years old, underwent general anesthesia requiring oro-tracheal intubation, were randomly assigned to undergo intubation using video intubationscope (group V) or Macintosh direct laryngoscope (group M), 30 cases in each. Each patient was provided mannal in-line axial stabilization of the head and neck by an experienced assistant. The following data were recorded and analyzed: glottic exposure time, Cormark-Lehane grade (C-L classification), tracheal intubation time, total intubation attempts, manoeuvre needed to aid tracheal intubation, failure for tracheal intubation, one-time success rate of tracheal intubation and total success rate of tracheal intubation, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) before induction of anesthesia, before intubation, at glottic exposure, at intubation, 1 and 3 min after intubation, and complications. Results Compared with group M, better glottic exposure view (C-L classification) was achieved in group V (P < 0.05), and the tracheal intubation time was shorter (P < 0.05), but the glottic exposure time was longer (P < 0.05). More assistance was need and the intubation failure and complication rate was higher in group M (P < 0.05). Compared with T1, MAP in group M were significantly increased at T2~T5 (P < 0.05), MAP in group V were no significantly changed at T2 (P > 0.05) and were significantly increased at T3~T5 (P < 0.05); compared with group M, MAP at T2~T4 in group V were significantly lower (P < 0.05). Compared with T1, HR in group V were no significantly changed at T2~T5, HR in group M were significantly increased at T2~T4 (P < 0.05), and significantly higher than that in group V at the same time point (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization, Video intubationscope could provide better view of glottic exposure, decrease the difficulty of intubation and increase the success rate of intubation, have less complications and influence on patient’s hemodynamics.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

卢增停,叶茜琳,张康聪,胡浩翔,涂泽华.明视插管软镜和Macintosh直接喉镜在颈椎制动患者气管插管中的比较[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,22(9):25-29

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-18
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-09-30
二维码
中国内镜杂志声明
关闭