鼻内镜下翼管神经联合筛前神经切断术治疗变应性鼻炎合并鼻息肉的临床疗效
作者:
作者单位:

钦州市第二人民医院 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,广西 钦州 535099

基金项目:

广西壮族自治区卫生健康委科研项目(No:Z-N20231878)


Clinical effect of endoscopic pterygoid nerve combined with anterior ethmoidal nerve blockade in treatment of allergic rhinitis complicated with nasal polyp
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, the Second People’s Hospital of Qinzhou, Qinzhou, Guangxi 535099, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | |
    摘要:

    目的 探讨鼻内镜下翼管神经联合筛前神经切断术治疗变应性鼻炎合并鼻息肉的临床疗效。方法 选择该院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科收治的变应性鼻炎合并鼻息肉患者108例,随机分为两组,各54例。对照组行常规鼻内镜下鼻窦手术,观察组行常规鼻内镜下鼻窦手术联合翼管神经和筛前神经切断术,对比两组患者治疗前、治疗后1周、2周、3周、3个月、6个月和1年的鼻腔疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、鼻结膜炎生存质量量表(RQLQ)评分、哮喘生存质量量表(AQLQ)评分、治疗总有效率和并发症发生率。结果 观察组治疗总有效率为98.15%,高于对照组的85.19%,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);治疗前,两组患者鼻腔阻力(NR)、鼻黏膜纤毛输送率(MTR)、鼻黏膜纤毛传输时间(MTT)和Lund—Kennedy评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05);两组患者治疗后MTR明显高于治疗前,且观察组高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);两组患者治疗后NR小于治疗前,且观察组小于对照组,MTT短于治疗前,且观察组短于对照组,Lund—Kennedy评分低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);治疗前,两组患者鼻腔疼痛VAS、RQLQ评分和AQLQ评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05);治疗后1周、2周、3周、3个月、6个月和1年,观察组鼻腔疼痛VAS明显低于对照组,观察组RQLQ评分明显低于对照组,AQLQ评分明显高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);观察组并发症发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 鼻内镜下翼管神经联合筛前神经切断术治疗变应性鼻炎合并鼻息肉,效果明显,不仅可有效地缓解患者鼻腔疼痛,还能提高术后生存质量,减少术后并发症,具有临床应用价值。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic pterygoid nerve combined with anterior ethmoidal nerve transection in treatment of allergic rhinitis with nasal polyps.Method A clinical practice study was conducted on 108 patients with allergic rhinitis complicated with nasal polyps. After enrollment, they were randomly divided into two groups, 54 cases were included in the control group and treated with conventional endoscopic sinus surgery, while 54 cases were included in the observation group and treated with conventional endoscopic sinus surgery combined with pterygoid nerve and ethmoidal nerve transection. The nasal pain visual analogue scale (VAS), rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ), asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ), total effective rate, and complication rate of the two groups were compared before treatment and 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment.Result Compared with the control group, the total effective rate of treatment was 98.15% in the observation group, which was higher than 85.19% in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in nasal resistance (NR), mucociliary transport rate (MTR), mucociliary transport time (MTT), and Lund-Kennedy scores between the two groups, the differences were no statistically significant (P > 0.05). After treatment, MTR in two groups increased compared with before treatment, and the observation group was higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); NR, MTT, and Lund-Kennedy scores in two groups decreased, and the observation group was lower than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in nasal pain VAS, RQLQ, and AQLQ between the two groups, the differences were no statistically significant (P > 0.05). After treatment, at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, the observation group had lower nasal pain VAS compared to the control group, while the observation group had lower RQLQ and higher AQLQ compared to the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).Conclusion The clinical efficacy of endoscopic pterygoid nerve combined with ethmoidal nerve transection for the treatment of allergic rhinitis complicated with nasal polyps is significant. It can not only effectively alleviate nasal pain in patients, but also improve their quality of life and reduce postoperative complications, which has clinical application value.

    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
    参考文献
    [1] 邓晓园, 王国蓉, 张甜, 等. 18岁以下人群变应性鼻炎患病率的Meta分析[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2023, 20(10): 1550-1557.DENG X Y, WANG G R, ZHANG T, et al. Meta-analysis of the prevalence of allergic rhinitis in individuals under 18 years old in China[J]. Nursing Practice and Research, 2023, 20(10): 1550-1557. Chinese
    [2] 李峰, 权芳, 龚继涛. 高选择性翼管神经分支切断术加筛前神经阻断术对难治性变应性鼻炎患者临床疗效及其影响因素研究[J]. 贵州医药, 2022, 46(5): 741-743.LI F, QUAN F, GONG J T. Clinical efficacy and influencing factors of highly selective pterygoid nerve branching surgery combined with anterior ethmoidal nerve blockade in patients with refractory allergic rhinitis[J]. Guizhou Medical Journal, 2022, 46(5): 741-743. Chinese
    [3] MA X K, ZHANG Y, GU X D, et al. A retrospective cohort study of sublingual immunotherapy with standardized dermatophagoides farinae drops for allergic rhinitis[J]. Adv Ther, 2021, 38(5): 2315-2322.
    [4] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组. 变应性鼻炎诊断和治疗指南(2015年, 天津)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(1): 6-24.Subspecialty Group of Rhinology, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Subspecialty Group of Rhinology, Society of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese Medical Association[J]. Chinese Journal of Othrhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2016, 51(1): 6-24. Chinese
    [5] 田海芳, 徐景利, 单立影, 等. 鼻腔填塞与低温等离子刀联合治疗鼻出血的效果及对炎性因子、VAS评分的影响[J]. 河北医药, 2023, 45(13): 2027-2029.TIAN H F, XU J L, SHAN L Y, et al. Hemostatic effect of nasal packing combined with low-temperature plasma coagulation on epistaxis and its effect on inflammatory factors and visual analogue scale scores[J]. Hebei Medical Journal, 2023,45(13): 2027-2029. Chinese
    [6] 于宏海, 陶宝鸿, 李勇, 等. 翼管神经切断术治疗中重度变应性鼻炎的临床疗效[J]. 现代实用医学, 2021, 33(6): 789-791.YU H H, TAO B H, LI Y, et al. Clinical efficacy of pterygoid nerve transection in the treatment of moderate to severe allergic rhinitis[J]. Modern Practical Medicine, 2021, 33(6): 789-791. Chinese
    [7] 孙嫚丽, 宋莉, 王吉, 等. 岩盐气溶胶疗法对职业性哮喘患者生存质量的影响[J]. 中国工业医学杂志, 2019, 32(3): 189-190.SUN M L, SONG L, WANG J, et al. Effect of rock salt aerosol therapy on life quality of patients with occupational asthma[J]. Chinese Journal of Industrial Medicine, 2019, 32(3): 189-190. Chinese
    [8] 张瑜, 戴显宁, 郑慧珍, 等. 筛前神经阻断术与选择性翼管神经切断术治疗中重度变应性鼻炎的疗效比较[J]. 温州医科大学学报, 2021, 51(3): 230-233.ZHANG Y, DAI X N, ZHENG H Z, et al. A comparison between anterior ethmoidal nerve block and selective pterygoid canal neurotomy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis[J]. Journal of Wenzhou Medical University, 2021, 51(3): 230-233. Chinese
    [9] 严旌仁, 杨屿楠, 李智群, 等. 变应性鼻炎与哮喘的因果关联分析[J]. 医学研究与战创伤救治, 2023, 36(11): 1143-1148.YAN J R, YANG Y N, LI Z Q, et al. Analysis of causalassociation between allergic rhinitis and asthma[J]. Journal of Medical Research & Combat Trauma Care, 2023, 36(11): 1143-1148. Chinese
    [10] GOLDING-WOOD P H. Observations on petrosal and vidian neurectomy in chronic vasomotor rhinitis[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 1961, 75(5): 232-247.
    [11] 计成. 内镜下等离子筛前神经阻断术治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效观察[J]. 中国社区医师(医学专业), 2011, 13(7): 105.JI C. Observation of the therapeutic effect of endoscopic plasma anterior ethmoid nerve blockade in the treatment of allergic rhinitis[J]. Chinese Community Doctors (Medical Major), 2011, 13(7): 105. Chinese
    [12] 谭凤武, 黎可华, 邓亚萍, 等. 鼻内镜下翼管神经切断术治疗中重度变应性鼻炎疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2020, 27(6): 351-356.TAN F W, LI K H, DENG Y P, et al. Efficacy and safety of nasal endoscopic vidian neurectomy in the management of moderate-severe allergic rhinitis: a Meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2020, 27(6): 351-356. Chinese
    [13] 向澎. 单、双侧鼻后神经切断术联合筛前神经切断术治疗中重度变应性鼻炎的近期疗效对比[D]. 百色: 右江民族医学院, 2023.XIANG P. Comparison of short-term efficacy of unilateral and bilateral posterior nasal neurotomy combined with anterior ethmoidal neurotomy in the treatment of moderate to severe allergic rhinitis[D]. Baise: Youjiang Medical University For Nationalities, 2023. Chinese
    [14] LEE T K, JEON Y J, JUNG S J. Bi-directional association between allergic rhinitis and diabetes mellitus from the national representative data of South Korea[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 4344.
    [15] 蒋美珍. 变应性鼻炎-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉应用双侧翼管神经切断术的治疗效果[J]. 中国医学文摘(耳鼻咽喉科学), 2023, 38(3): 11-13.JIANG M Z. To explore the feasibility of bilateral ateral neurotomy in patients with allergic rhinitis-sinusitis with nasal polyps[J]. Chinese Medical Digest (Otorhinolaryngology), 2023, 38(3): 11-13. Chinese
    [16] 肖志超. 鼻内镜下低温等离子翼管神经切断术治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效评估[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2021, 34(13): 2280-2282.XIAO Z C. Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of low-temperature plasma pterygoid nerve resection under nasal endoscopy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis[J]. The Journal of Medical Theory & Practice, 2021, 34(13): 2280-2282. Chinese
    [17] 周倩, 高宇, 潘春晨, 等. 鼻后神经及咽支切断术治疗合并常年性变应性鼻炎的慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者的疗效评估[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2023, 37(5): 360-364.ZHOU Q, GAO Y, PAN C C, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of endoscopic posterior nasal neurectomy with pharyngeal neurectomy of allergic rhinitis combined with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2023, 37(5): 360-364. Chinese
    [18] VASILEIADOU S, EKERLJUNG L, BJERG A, et al. Asthma increased in young adults from 2008-2016 despite stable allergic rhinitis and reduced smoking[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(6): e0253322.RHA M S, CHO H J, YOON J H, et al. Association between the use of electronic cigarettes and the prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis and allergic rhinitis:a nationwide cross-sectional study[J]. Rhinology, 2022, 60(1): 20-28.
    [19] 楚士东, 慈军. 翼管神经主干或分支切断术治疗难治性变应性鼻炎60例报告[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2023, 58(7): 705-709.CHU S D, CI J. Surgical treatment of vidianneurectomy and selective vidianneurectomy in 60 cases of refractory allergic rhinitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2023, 58(7): 705-709. Chinese
    引证文献
引用本文

梁恒伟,温丽慧,吕忠.鼻内镜下翼管神经联合筛前神经切断术治疗变应性鼻炎合并鼻息肉的临床疗效[J].中国内镜杂志,2024,30(8):52-59

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:130
  • 下载次数: 363
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-30
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-09-02
二维码
中国内镜杂志声明
关闭