粪便SDC2、ADHFE1和PPP2R5C基因甲基化检测与粪便隐血试验在结直肠癌筛查中的比较研究
作者:
作者单位:

厦门大学附属中山医院(厦门市消化内科专业质量控制中心) 消化内镜中心,福建 厦门 361004

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Comparative study of fecal SDC2, ADHFE1, and PPP2R5C gene methylation detection and fecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening
Author:
Affiliation:

Digestive Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University (Xiamen Municipal Quality Control Center for Gastroenterology), Xiamen, Fujian 361004, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 对比粪便SDC2、ADHFE1和PPP2R5C基因甲基化阳性患者与粪便隐血试验阳性患者的结肠镜检查结果,旨在分析结直肠癌(CRC)筛查效果,以期为CRC筛查风险评估提供科学依据。方法 选取2023年12月-2024年5月该院针对40~80岁CRC高危人群发放的SDC2、ADHFE1和PPP2R5C基因甲基化联合检测试剂盒,共9 284份。检测阳性患者841例(9.1%),电话动员患者进行结肠镜检查,以结肠镜联合病理诊断为判定标准,共有495例阳性患者完成电子结肠镜检查。其中,行粪便SDC2、ADHFE1和PPP2R5C基因甲基化检测阳性,并完成电子结肠镜检查的患者251例作为观察组,同期选取粪便隐血试验阳性,并行电子结肠镜检查的患者244例作为对照组。比较两组患者息肉数量、形态、病变部位和病变类型。结果 两组患者息肉数量和部位比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。观察组山田Ⅰ型占比低于对照组,山田Ⅱ型占比高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组中,1例CRC(0.4%),62例进展期腺瘤(24.7%),78例非进展期腺瘤(31.1%),20例增生性息肉(8.0%),90例无异型增生病变(35.9%);对照组中,6例(2.5%)CRC,38例(15.6%)进展期腺瘤,53例(21.7%)非进展期腺瘤,19例(7.8%)增生性息肉,128例(52.5%)无异型增生病变,对照组非进展期腺瘤占比和进展期性腺瘤占比明显低于观察组,无异型增生病变占比明显高于观察组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 粪便SDC2、ADHFE1和PPP2R5C基因甲基化检测,在结直肠非进展期腺瘤和进展期腺瘤中的检出率明显高于粪便隐血试验。值得临床推广应用。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the colonoscopy results of patients with positive fecal SDC2, ADHFE1, and PPP2R5C gene methylation tests to those with positive fecal occult blood tests, and analyze the effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This study aims to provide a scientific basis for risk assessment in CRC screening.Methods From December 2023 to May 2024, 9 284 combined test kits for SDC2, ADHFE1, and PPP2R5C gene methylation were distributed to high-risk individuals aged 40 ~ 80 years. Among them, 841 patients (9.1%) tested positive. These patients were encouraged via telephone to undergo colonoscopy, with colonoscopy combined with pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, a total of 495 positive patients completed electronic colonoscopy. Among them, the 251 patients who tested positive for fecal SDC2, ADHFE1, and PPP2R5C gene methylation and completed electronic colonoscopy were the observation group; concurrently, 244 patients who tested positive for fecal occult blood tests and underwent electronic colonoscopy were selected as the control group. Compare two groups of patients with polyp, number, shape, pathological changes and pathological types.Results There was no statistically significant difference in number and lesion location of polyps between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). The proportion of Yamada type I in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, while the proportion of Yamada type II was higher than that in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In the observation group, 1 case (0.4%) of CRC, 62 cases (24.7%) of advanced adenomas, 78 cases (31.1%) of non-advanced adenomas, 20 cases (8.0%) of hyperplastic polyps, and 90 cases (35.9%) with no dysplastic lesions were identified. In the control group, 6 cases (2.5%) of CRC, 38 cases (15.6%) of advanced adenomas, 53 cases (21.7%) of non-advanced adenomas, 19 cases (7.8%) of hyperplastic polyps, and 128 cases (52.5%) with no dysplastic lesions were identified. The proportions of non-advanced adenomas and advanced adenomas were lower in the control group than those in the observation group, while the no dysplastic lesions rate was higher in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).Conclusion The detection rate of colorectal non-advanced adenomas and advanced adenomas is higher with fecal SDC2, ADHFE1, and PPP2R5C gene methylation testing compared to the fecal occult blood test.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

冯娟,林丽玉,叶学云,吴永涛,邬凤欣,许丽珠,周丽香.粪便SDC2、ADHFE1和PPP2R5C基因甲基化检测与粪便隐血试验在结直肠癌筛查中的比较研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2025,31(7):31-36

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-25
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-08-06
二维码
中国内镜杂志声明
关闭